Louisiana Greyhound Club, Inc. v. Clancy
This text of 120 So. 295 (Louisiana Greyhound Club, Inc. v. Clancy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On the Merits.
The district court has rendered a judgment in this case, dismissing the suit on an exception of no cause óf action, since the judgment refusing to grant a writ of injunction was affirmed by this court. The case has been submitted on an agreement be-between the parties, plaintiff and defendants, that it shall be decided on the briefs filed when the case was on appeal from the judgment refusing to issue the injunction. See Louisiana Greyhound Club, Inc., v. Clancy, Sheriff, et al., No. 29578 (La. Sup.) 119 So. 532. 1 The only basis for the suit is the plaintiff’s contention that the Act 70 of 1928 is unconstitutional, for the reasons stated in our opinion rendered in the former appeal, where we decided that the statute was not unconstitutional for the reasons there given.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Ante, p. 511.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 So. 295, 167 La. 784, 1929 La. LEXIS 1687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisiana-greyhound-club-inc-v-clancy-la-1929.