Louisiana ex rel. Schmidt v. Sanders

248 U.S. 534, 39 S. Ct. 19, 63 L. Ed. 407, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1623
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 11, 1918
DocketNo 1
StatusPublished

This text of 248 U.S. 534 (Louisiana ex rel. Schmidt v. Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Louisiana ex rel. Schmidt v. Sanders, 248 U.S. 534, 39 S. Ct. 19, 63 L. Ed. 407, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1623 (1918).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon/the authority of (1) Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14. (2) Stearn v. Minnesota, 179 U. S. 223; Board of Liquidation v. Louisiana, 179 U. S. 622. (3) Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stearns v. Minnesota
179 U.S. 223 (Supreme Court, 1900)
BOARD OF LIQUIDATION & Cv LOUISIANA
179 U.S. 622 (Supreme Court, 1901)
Goodrich v. Ferris
214 U.S. 71 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Brolan v. United States
236 U.S. 216 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Stewart v. City of Kansas
239 U.S. 14 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co.
244 U.S. 300 (Supreme Court, 1917)
Bilby v. Stewart
246 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 U.S. 534, 39 S. Ct. 19, 63 L. Ed. 407, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisiana-ex-rel-schmidt-v-sanders-scotus-1918.