Louisiana ex rel. Schmidt v. Sanders
248 U.S. 534, 39 S. Ct. 19, 63 L. Ed. 407, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1623
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon/the authority of (1) Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14. (2) Stearn v. Minnesota, 179 U. S. 223; Board of Liquidation v. Louisiana, 179 U. S. 622. (3) Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Louisiana ex rel. Schmidt v. Sanders, 248 U.S. 534, 39 S. Ct. 19, 63 L. Ed. 407, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1623 (1918).
248 U.S. 534 (Louisiana ex rel. Schmidt v. Sanders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stearns v. Minnesota
179 U.S. 223 (Supreme Court, 1900)
BOARD OF LIQUIDATION & Cv LOUISIANA
179 U.S. 622 (Supreme Court, 1901)
Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Hanley
205 U.S. 225 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Goodrich v. Ferris
214 U.S. 71 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Brolan v. United States
236 U.S. 216 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Stewart v. City of Kansas
239 U.S. 14 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co.
244 U.S. 300 (Supreme Court, 1917)
Bilby v. Stewart
246 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 1918)