Louisiana ex rel. Duggan v. Crandell

Supreme Court

Louisiana ex rel. Duggan v. Crandell

254 U.S. 612, 41 S. Ct. 61, 65 L. Ed. 437, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1131

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 15, 1920

DocketNo. 81

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 254 U.S. 612 (Louisiana ex rel. Duggan v. Crandell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Louisiana ex rel. Duggan v. Crandell, 254 U.S. 612, 41 S. Ct. 61, 65 L. Ed. 437, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1131 (1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana. Argued November 9,1920. Decided November 15, 1920. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1). Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U. S. 526, 530; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147. (2) California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389, 393; Gaar, Scott & Co. v. Shannon, 223 U. S. 468, 470; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 303; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271. Mr. Henry H. Glassie, with whom Mr. W. J. Hennessy, Mr. W. O. Hart and Mr. Duane E. Fox were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. Paul A. Sompayrac, with whom Mr. L. E. Hall was on the brief, for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana. Argued November 9,1920. Decided November 15, 1920. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1). Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U. S. 526, 530; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147. (2) California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389, 393; Gaar, Scott & Co. v. Shannon, 223 U. S. 468, 470; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 303; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271. Mr. Henry H. Glassie, with whom Mr. W. J. Hennessy, Mr. W. O. Hart and Mr. Duane E. Fox were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. Paul A. Sompayrac, with whom Mr. L. E. Hall was on the brief, for defendant in error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 U.S. 612, 41 S. Ct. 61, 65 L. Ed. 437, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisiana-ex-rel-duggan-v-crandell-scotus-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack