Louisiana ex rel. Duggan v. Crandell
Opinion
Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana. Argued November 9,1920. Decided November 15, 1920. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1). Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U. S. 526, 530; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147. (2) California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389, 393; Gaar, Scott & Co. v. Shannon, 223 U. S. 468, 470; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 303; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271. Mr. Henry H. Glassie, with whom Mr. W. J. Hennessy, Mr. W. O. Hart and Mr. Duane E. Fox were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. Paul A. Sompayrac, with whom Mr. L. E. Hall was on the brief, for defendant in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
254 U.S. 612 (Louisiana ex rel. Duggan v. Crandell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.