Louis Washington, Jr., and Jacob Washington v. Holly Thompson, Jr., Victoria Dix, Verlin Dix, Angela Dix, Timothy Robinson, Stanley Robinson, Judith M. Robinson, and Unknown

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 30, 2024
Docket06-24-00056-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Louis Washington, Jr., and Jacob Washington v. Holly Thompson, Jr., Victoria Dix, Verlin Dix, Angela Dix, Timothy Robinson, Stanley Robinson, Judith M. Robinson, and Unknown (Louis Washington, Jr., and Jacob Washington v. Holly Thompson, Jr., Victoria Dix, Verlin Dix, Angela Dix, Timothy Robinson, Stanley Robinson, Judith M. Robinson, and Unknown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Louis Washington, Jr., and Jacob Washington v. Holly Thompson, Jr., Victoria Dix, Verlin Dix, Angela Dix, Timothy Robinson, Stanley Robinson, Judith M. Robinson, and Unknown, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-24-00056-CV

LOUIS WASHINGTON, JR., AND JACOB WASHINGTON, Appellants

V.

HOLLY THOMPSON, JR., VICTORIA DIX, VERLIN DIX, ANGELA DIX, TIMOTHY ROBINSON, STANLEY ROBINSON, JUDITH M. ROBINSON, AND UNKNOWN CLAIMANTS, Appellees

On Appeal from the 71st District Court Harrison County, Texas Trial Court No. 21-0508

Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Stevens MEMORANDUM OPINION

Louis Washington, Jr., and Jacob Washington filed a notice of appeal from the trial

court’s declaratory judgment signed on May 2, 2024. Under Rule 26.1 of the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure, a “notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the judgment is

signed” unless a qualifying post-judgment motion is filed that extends that deadline to ninety

days. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). Based on the record before this Court, there were no post-

judgment motions filed in this matter that extended the filing deadline; thus, the deadline for

filing a notice of appeal from the trial court’s May 2, 2024, judgment was June 3, 2024. The

notice of appeal in this matter was not filed until July 23, 2024, which is beyond the deadline

established by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

“There is a limited exception that allows a party to modify the above time periods for

perfecting an appeal when a party lacks notice and actual knowledge of the trial court’s

judgment.” Tex. Educ. Agency v. Excellence 2000, Inc., No. 01-24-00368-CV, 2024 WL

3817123, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Aug. 15, 2024, no pet. h.) (per curiam) (mem.

op.). “If a party does not receive notice or acquire actual knowledge that a judgment or

appealable order was signed within 20 days of the signing, the deadlines above shall begin on the

date the party or his counsel received notice or acquired actual knowledge, whichever is first.”

Id. (citing TEX. R. APP. P. 4.2(a)(1); TEX. R. CIV. P. 306a(4)).

However, as our sister court in Houston aptly noted, “an extension under these rules is

not automatic.” Id. “To extend a deadline to file a notice of appeal, a party must file a sworn

motion in the trial court to prove the date on which he received notice or acquired actual

2 knowledge of the trial court’s judgment.” Id. (citing TEX. R. APP. P. 4.2(b); TEX. R. CIV. P.

306a(5)). “After a hearing on the motion, the trial court must sign a written order specifying the

date when the party or the party’s attorney first received notice or acquired actual knowledge of

the trial court’s judgment.” Id. (citing TEX. R. APP. P. 4.2(c)).

Here, the appellants filed a motion for extension of time to file their notice appeal,1

claiming that neither they nor their attorney received notice of entry of judgment within twenty

days after it was signed. We denied that motion because the record does not show that the

appellants filed a sworn motion in the trial court to prove the date on which they received notice

or acquired actual knowledge of the trial court’s judgment. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.2(b); TEX. R.

CIV. P. 306a(5). Thereafter, we notified the appellants that their appeal was subject to dismissal

for want of jurisdiction unless they could demonstrate proper grounds for our retention of the

appeal on our docket. See Mem’l Hosp. of Galveston Cnty. v. Gillis, 741 S.W.2d 364, 365 (Tex.

1987) (per curiam) (“Compliance with the time periods prescribed by [Rule 306a] is a

jurisdictional prerequisite.”).

1 The appellants’ motion to extend the deadline for filing their notice of appeal was filed on July 14, 2024, and they did not file a notice of appeal until July 23, 2024. As a result, they did not qualify for an extension of the filing deadline under Rule 26.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. 3 Because the appellants failed to follow the procedures required by Rule 306a of the Texas

Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 4.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure to extend the

deadline for filing their notice of appeal, their appeal was untimely, and we lack jurisdiction over

it. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Scott E. Stevens Chief Justice Date Submitted: August 29, 2024 Date Decided: August 30, 2024

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Memorial Hospital of Galveston County v. Gillis
741 S.W.2d 364 (Texas Supreme Court, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Louis Washington, Jr., and Jacob Washington v. Holly Thompson, Jr., Victoria Dix, Verlin Dix, Angela Dix, Timothy Robinson, Stanley Robinson, Judith M. Robinson, and Unknown, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louis-washington-jr-and-jacob-washington-v-holly-thompson-jr-texapp-2024.