Louis Washington, Jr., and Jacob Washington v. Holly Thompson, Jr., Victoria Dix, Verlin Dix, Angela Dix, Timothy Robinson, Stanley Robinson, Judith M. Robinson, and Unknown
This text of Louis Washington, Jr., and Jacob Washington v. Holly Thompson, Jr., Victoria Dix, Verlin Dix, Angela Dix, Timothy Robinson, Stanley Robinson, Judith M. Robinson, and Unknown (Louis Washington, Jr., and Jacob Washington v. Holly Thompson, Jr., Victoria Dix, Verlin Dix, Angela Dix, Timothy Robinson, Stanley Robinson, Judith M. Robinson, and Unknown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-24-00056-CV
LOUIS WASHINGTON, JR., AND JACOB WASHINGTON, Appellants
V.
HOLLY THOMPSON, JR., VICTORIA DIX, VERLIN DIX, ANGELA DIX, TIMOTHY ROBINSON, STANLEY ROBINSON, JUDITH M. ROBINSON, AND UNKNOWN CLAIMANTS, Appellees
On Appeal from the 71st District Court Harrison County, Texas Trial Court No. 21-0508
Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Stevens MEMORANDUM OPINION
Louis Washington, Jr., and Jacob Washington filed a notice of appeal from the trial
court’s declaratory judgment signed on May 2, 2024. Under Rule 26.1 of the Texas Rules of
Appellate Procedure, a “notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the judgment is
signed” unless a qualifying post-judgment motion is filed that extends that deadline to ninety
days. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). Based on the record before this Court, there were no post-
judgment motions filed in this matter that extended the filing deadline; thus, the deadline for
filing a notice of appeal from the trial court’s May 2, 2024, judgment was June 3, 2024. The
notice of appeal in this matter was not filed until July 23, 2024, which is beyond the deadline
established by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
“There is a limited exception that allows a party to modify the above time periods for
perfecting an appeal when a party lacks notice and actual knowledge of the trial court’s
judgment.” Tex. Educ. Agency v. Excellence 2000, Inc., No. 01-24-00368-CV, 2024 WL
3817123, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Aug. 15, 2024, no pet. h.) (per curiam) (mem.
op.). “If a party does not receive notice or acquire actual knowledge that a judgment or
appealable order was signed within 20 days of the signing, the deadlines above shall begin on the
date the party or his counsel received notice or acquired actual knowledge, whichever is first.”
Id. (citing TEX. R. APP. P. 4.2(a)(1); TEX. R. CIV. P. 306a(4)).
However, as our sister court in Houston aptly noted, “an extension under these rules is
not automatic.” Id. “To extend a deadline to file a notice of appeal, a party must file a sworn
motion in the trial court to prove the date on which he received notice or acquired actual
2 knowledge of the trial court’s judgment.” Id. (citing TEX. R. APP. P. 4.2(b); TEX. R. CIV. P.
306a(5)). “After a hearing on the motion, the trial court must sign a written order specifying the
date when the party or the party’s attorney first received notice or acquired actual knowledge of
the trial court’s judgment.” Id. (citing TEX. R. APP. P. 4.2(c)).
Here, the appellants filed a motion for extension of time to file their notice appeal,1
claiming that neither they nor their attorney received notice of entry of judgment within twenty
days after it was signed. We denied that motion because the record does not show that the
appellants filed a sworn motion in the trial court to prove the date on which they received notice
or acquired actual knowledge of the trial court’s judgment. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.2(b); TEX. R.
CIV. P. 306a(5). Thereafter, we notified the appellants that their appeal was subject to dismissal
for want of jurisdiction unless they could demonstrate proper grounds for our retention of the
appeal on our docket. See Mem’l Hosp. of Galveston Cnty. v. Gillis, 741 S.W.2d 364, 365 (Tex.
1987) (per curiam) (“Compliance with the time periods prescribed by [Rule 306a] is a
jurisdictional prerequisite.”).
1 The appellants’ motion to extend the deadline for filing their notice of appeal was filed on July 14, 2024, and they did not file a notice of appeal until July 23, 2024. As a result, they did not qualify for an extension of the filing deadline under Rule 26.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. 3 Because the appellants failed to follow the procedures required by Rule 306a of the Texas
Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 4.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure to extend the
deadline for filing their notice of appeal, their appeal was untimely, and we lack jurisdiction over
it. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Scott E. Stevens Chief Justice Date Submitted: August 29, 2024 Date Decided: August 30, 2024
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Louis Washington, Jr., and Jacob Washington v. Holly Thompson, Jr., Victoria Dix, Verlin Dix, Angela Dix, Timothy Robinson, Stanley Robinson, Judith M. Robinson, and Unknown, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louis-washington-jr-and-jacob-washington-v-holly-thompson-jr-texapp-2024.