Louis W. Bohm v. United States of America, Robert T. Bolo v. United States of America, Robert T. Bolo and Louis W. Bohm v. United States
This text of 229 F.2d 739 (Louis W. Bohm v. United States of America, Robert T. Bolo v. United States of America, Robert T. Bolo and Louis W. Bohm v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The above cases came on to be heard on a transcript of the record, the, briefs of the parties, and argument of counsel in open court. It appears that both direct and circumstantial evidence presented a question of fact for the jury. There was evidence from which the jury could conclude that the acts of appellants’ agent were done by their authority, under their direction, and in concert with them. The verdict of appellants’ guilt was sustained by the proofs; the claim of reversible error in the court’s instructions is without merit; and, accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
229 F.2d 739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louis-w-bohm-v-united-states-of-america-robert-t-bolo-v-united-states-ca6-1955.