Louis W. Bohm v. United States of America, Robert T. Bolo v. United States of America, Robert T. Bolo and Louis W. Bohm v. United States

229 F.2d 739
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedNovember 7, 1955
Docket12392-12394_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 229 F.2d 739 (Louis W. Bohm v. United States of America, Robert T. Bolo v. United States of America, Robert T. Bolo and Louis W. Bohm v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Louis W. Bohm v. United States of America, Robert T. Bolo v. United States of America, Robert T. Bolo and Louis W. Bohm v. United States, 229 F.2d 739 (6th Cir. 1955).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cases came on to be heard on a transcript of the record, the, briefs of the parties, and argument of counsel in open court. It appears that both direct and circumstantial evidence presented a question of fact for the jury. There was evidence from which the jury could conclude that the acts of appellants’ agent were done by their authority, under their direction, and in concert with them. The verdict of appellants’ guilt was sustained by the proofs; the claim of reversible error in the court’s instructions is without merit; and, accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John E. Huber v. Byrd S. Huber
229 F.2d 739 (Sixth Circuit, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
229 F.2d 739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louis-w-bohm-v-united-states-of-america-robert-t-bolo-v-united-states-ca6-1955.