Louis Vuitton Malletier v. Various John Does
This text of Louis Vuitton Malletier v. Various John Does (Louis Vuitton Malletier v. Various John Does) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil No. 07-273 (RCL) ) VARIOUS JOHN DOES NOS. 1–300, and ) XYZ COMPANIES NOS. 1–20, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________)
MEMORANDUM
The Court will, in a separate Order issued today, grant plaintiff’s Motion [64] for Entry of
Default Judgment. The Clerk of the Court entered default as to all defendants on February 17,
2009. All defendants have failed to respond to the entry of default.
Several of the default notices were returned as undeliverable after being mailed to certain
defendants. This does not affect the Court’s ability to enter default, as it is each party’s
responsibility to keep the Court appraised of any changes of address. See Local Civ. R. 11.1.
Also, notice of the entry of default against defendant Tore Britbil was not mailed because he has
no fixed address known by the Court. Again, the defendant—having been personally served on
December 6, 2008 (see Return of Service [48])—is responsible for appraising the Court of an
address for correspondence, and defendant Britbil’s failure to do so does not preclude default
judgment.
Signed by Royce C. Lamberth, Chief Judge, on March 31, 2009.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Louis Vuitton Malletier v. Various John Does, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louis-vuitton-malletier-v-various-john-does-dcd-2009.