Louis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Louis v. State

510 S.W.3d 900, 2017 WL 676734

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 21, 2017·No. ED 104060·Published

Opinion

[901] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sarnie J. Louis (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15¹ motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of. the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2015).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[901] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sarnie J. Louis (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15¹ motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of. the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2015).

Footnotes

Louis v. State, 510 S.W.3d 900, 2017 WL 676734 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

510 S.W.3d 900 (Louis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.