Louis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Louis v. State

105 S.W.3d 849, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 746, 2003 WL 21150363

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 20, 2003·No. No. ED 81664·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Samie Louis (“movant”) appeals from the judgment by the motion court which denied his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035 on the merits without an evidentia-ry hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

[850] However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Samie Louis (“movant”) appeals from the judgment by the motion court which denied his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035 on the merits without an evidentia-ry hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

[850] However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Louis v. State, 105 S.W.3d 849, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 746, 2003 WL 21150363 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

105 S.W.3d 849 (Louis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related