Louis v. Hardee

D.C. Circuit

Louis v. Hardee

85 F.2d 423, 66 App. D.C. 166, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4134

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJune 29, 1936

DocketNo. 6568

StatusPublished

This text of 85 F.2d 423 (Louis v. Hardee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Louis v. Hardee, 85 F.2d 423, 66 App. D.C. 166, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4134 (D.C. Cir. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

GRONER, Associate Justice.

This case was submitted with Nos. 6626, Davis Trust Company, Trustee, et al. v. Cary A. Hardee, Receiver of the Federal-American National Bank and Trust Company, et al., 66 App.D.C. 168, 85 F.(2d) 571, and 6620, W. Bertrand Acker et al. v. Norman R. Hamilton, Receiver of the District National Bank, et al., 66 App.D.C. 171, 85 F.(2d) 574,

Appellant in this case was a stockholder in Federal-American National Bank & Trust Company and was sued by the receiver on an assessment made by the Comptroller of the Currency on stock owned by her. In defending the action she assigned the same reasons urged in behalf of the other stockholders of that bank in the equity suit of Davis Trust Company, Trustee, et al. v. Cary A. Hardee, Receiver of the Federal-American National Bank and Trust Company, et al. (No. 6626), in which they sought an injunction to restrain the receiver from enforcing collection of assessments. We ruled adversely to the stockholders in the Davis Case on all the questions which are urged here, and it would serve no useful purpose to repeat here what was said there.

From an inspection of the whole record, we are of opinion that nothing is shown to defeat the action of the receiver.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRONER, Associate Justice.

This case was submitted with Nos. 6626, Davis Trust Company, Trustee, et al. v. Cary A. Hardee, Receiver of the Federal-American National Bank and Trust Company, et al., 66 App.D.C. 168, 85 F.(2d) 571, and 6620, W. Bertrand Acker et al. v. Norman R. Hamilton, Receiver of the District National Bank, et al., 66 App.D.C. 171, 85 F.(2d) 574,

Appellant in this case was a stockholder in Federal-American National Bank & Trust Company and was sued by the receiver on an assessment made by the Comptroller of the Currency on stock owned by her. In defending the action she assigned the same reasons urged in behalf of the other stockholders of that bank in the equity suit of Davis Trust Company, Trustee, et al. v. Cary A. Hardee, Receiver of the Federal-American National Bank and Trust Company, et al. (No. 6626), in which they sought an injunction to restrain the receiver from enforcing collection of assessments. We ruled adversely to the stockholders in the Davis Case on all the questions which are urged here, and it would serve no useful purpose to repeat here what was said there.

From an inspection of the whole record, we are of opinion that nothing is shown to defeat the action of the receiver.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 F.2d 423, 66 App. D.C. 166, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louis-v-hardee-cadc-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack