Louis v. Fortune Insurance Co.

609 So. 2d 104, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11759, 1992 WL 348602
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 24, 1992·No. No. 92-738·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the summary judgment for the insurance carrier, notwithstanding a settlement by the insured with a third party tortfeasor. There are triable issues of material fact in regard to the components of the negotiations resulting in the settlement, and also a doubt as to the sufficiency of the evidence to establish the threshold for recovery. Parker v. Bryce, 96 So.2d 154 (Fla.1957); Correia v. Seaboard Coast [105]*105Line Railroad Company, 393 So.2d 1161 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Ritchey v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 361 So.2d 438 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).

The cause is remanded to the trial court for a trial on all the issues.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Louis v. Fortune Insurance Co., 609 So. 2d 104, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11759, 1992 WL 348602 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

609 So. 2d 104 (Louis v. Fortune Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ritchey v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
361 So. 2d 438 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Correia v. Seaboard Coast Line RR Co.
393 So. 2d 1161 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Parker v. Bryce
96 So. 2d 154 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)