Louis v. Fortune Insurance Co.
This text of 609 So. 2d 104 (Louis v. Fortune Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We reverse the summary judgment for the insurance carrier, notwithstanding a settlement by the insured with a third party tortfeasor. There are triable issues of material fact in regard to the components of the negotiations resulting in the settlement, and also a doubt as to the sufficiency of the evidence to establish the threshold for recovery. Parker v. Bryce, 96 So.2d 154 (Fla.1957); Correia v. Seaboard Coast [105]*105Line Railroad Company, 393 So.2d 1161 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Ritchey v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 361 So.2d 438 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).
The cause is remanded to the trial court for a trial on all the issues.
Reversed and remanded with directions.
BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
609 So. 2d 104, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11759, 1992 WL 348602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louis-v-fortune-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1992.