Louis v. Baltimore American Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Louis v. Baltimore American Insurance

250 A.D. 817, 295 N.Y.S. 752, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9109

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 19, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 250 A.D. 817 (Louis v. Baltimore American Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Louis v. Baltimore American Insurance, 250 A.D. 817, 295 N.Y.S. 752, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9109 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Separate appeals by the respective defendants from separate judgments in favor of plaintiff, entered in Cortland county, on the verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff; also appeals from orders denying motions for new trial, the cases having been tried together. The actions are brought to recover under fire insurance policies by defendants to plaintiff, covering his stock of men’s clothing. The loss claimed is for damage caused by smoke from a fire in stores located near the store of plaintiff. Defendants assert that the verdict is against the weight of evidence; that there is improper and insufficient proof of loss and damage; that plaintiff is barred from recovery because he presented a false and fraudulent claim. Judgments and orders unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs to plaintiff. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Separate appeals by the respective defendants from separate judgments in favor of plaintiff, entered in Cortland county, on the verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff; also appeals from orders denying motions for new trial, the cases having been tried together. The actions are brought to recover under fire insurance policies by defendants to plaintiff, covering his stock of men’s clothing. The loss claimed is for damage caused by smoke from a fire in stores located near the store of plaintiff. Defendants assert that the verdict is against the weight of evidence; that there is improper and insufficient proof of loss and damage; that plaintiff is barred from recovery because he presented a false and fraudulent claim. Judgments and orders unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs to plaintiff. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D. 817, 295 N.Y.S. 752, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louis-v-baltimore-american-insurance-nyappdiv-1937.