Louis Torzillo v. Hon. Judge Sidney Goldmann, Hon. Judge Freund, and Hon. Judge Haneman

Third Circuit

Louis Torzillo v. Hon. Judge Sidney Goldmann, Hon. Judge Freund, and Hon. Judge Haneman

293 F.2d 273

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedAugust 1, 1961

Docket13574

StatusPublished

This text of 293 F.2d 273 (Louis Torzillo v. Hon. Judge Sidney Goldmann, Hon. Judge Freund, and Hon. Judge Haneman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Louis Torzillo v. Hon. Judge Sidney Goldmann, Hon. Judge Freund, and Hon. Judge Haneman, 293 F.2d 273 (3d Cir. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have examined carefully the record in this case and have considered the arguments of the parties. A cogent explanation of the relevant circumstances is contained in the opinion of the defendants in State v. Torzillo, 1960, 61 N.J.Super. 253, 160 A.2d 511, and in that of Judge Meaney in the court below in the instant case. We can perceive no valid basis for Torzillo’s complaint that his civil rights have been violated in breach of R.S.1979, Section 1 of the Civil Rights Act of April 20, 1871, 17 Stat. 13, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983, or that he was denied any right guaranteed to him by the Fourteenth Amendment. Accordingly the judgment will be affirmed, D.C., 190 F.Supp. 504.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have examined carefully the record in this case and have considered the arguments of the parties. A cogent explanation of the relevant circumstances is contained in the opinion of the defendants in State v. Torzillo, 1960, 61 N.J.Super. 253, 160 A.2d 511, and in that of Judge Meaney in the court below in the instant case. We can perceive no valid basis for Torzillo’s complaint that his civil rights have been violated in breach of R.S.1979, Section 1 of the Civil Rights Act of April 20, 1871, 17 Stat. 13, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983, or that he was denied any right guaranteed to him by the Fourteenth Amendment. Accordingly the judgment will be affirmed, D.C., 190 F.Supp. 504.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 F.2d 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louis-torzillo-v-hon-judge-sidney-goldmann-hon-judge-freund-and-hon-ca3-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack