Louis Taylor v. County of Pima

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Louis Taylor v. County of Pima. Read the opinion of the Court — 913 F.3d 930
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 14, 2019·No. 17-16980·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LOUIS TAYLOR, a single man, No. 17-16980 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 4:15-cv-00152-RM

COUNTY OF PIMA, a body politic; CITY OF TUCSON, a body politic, ORDER Defendants-Appellants.

Filed August 14, 2019

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Eugene E. Siler,* and Susan P. Graber, Circuit Judges.

Order

* The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. 2 TAYLOR V. COUNTY OF PIMA

Judges Siler and Graber voted to deny the petitions for panel rehearing. Judge Schroeder voted to grant the petitions for panel rehearing. Judge Graber voted to deny the petitions for rehearing en banc, and Judge Siler so recommended. Judge Schroeder recommended granting the petitions for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petitions for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on en banc rehearing. The matter failed to receive a majority of votes of non-recused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35(f).

Judge Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

The petitions for panel rehearing and the petitions for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Louis Taylor v. County of Pima, (9th Cir. 2019).

Louis Taylor v. County of Pima (Louis Taylor v. County of Pima) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.