Louis Rockoff v. Vitex Manufacturing Company, Ltd

342 F.2d 996, 51 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 31,679
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedMarch 31, 1965
Docket14991_1
StatusPublished

This text of 342 F.2d 996 (Louis Rockoff v. Vitex Manufacturing Company, Ltd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Louis Rockoff v. Vitex Manufacturing Company, Ltd, 342 F.2d 996, 51 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 31,679 (3d Cir. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is a suit for unpaid and overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Asserting that the plaintiff was an executive employee not covered by the Act the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment accompanied by supporting affidavits. The plaintiff filed no counter affidavits, relying solely upon a stipulation which his counsel alleges he entered into with counsel for the defendant in open court but which the record fails to substantiate. The district court entered a summary judgment for the defendant which is fully supported by the opinion filed by Judge Gordon in the district court. 230 F.Supp. 23. Upon that opinion the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rockoff v. Vitex Manufacturing Co.
230 F. Supp. 23 (Virgin Islands, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
342 F.2d 996, 51 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 31,679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louis-rockoff-v-vitex-manufacturing-company-ltd-ca3-1965.