Louis Rockoff v. Vitex Manufacturing Company, Ltd

Third Circuit

Louis Rockoff v. Vitex Manufacturing Company, Ltd

342 F.2d 996, 51 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 31,679

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided March 31, 1965·No. 14991_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is a suit for unpaid and overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Asserting that the plaintiff was an executive employee not covered by the Act the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment accompanied by supporting affidavits. The plaintiff filed no counter affidavits, relying solely upon a stipulation which his counsel alleges he entered into with counsel for the defendant in open court but which the record fails to substantiate. The district court entered a summary judgment for the defendant which is fully supported by the opinion filed by Judge Gordon in the district court. 230 F.Supp. 23. Upon that opinion the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is a suit for unpaid and overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Asserting that the plaintiff was an executive employee not covered by the Act the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment accompanied by supporting affidavits. The plaintiff filed no counter affidavits, relying solely upon a stipulation which his counsel alleges he entered into with counsel for the defendant in open court but which the record fails to substantiate. The district court entered a summary judgment for the defendant which is fully supported by the opinion filed by Judge Gordon in the district court. 230 F.Supp. 23. Upon that opinion the judgment will be affirmed.

Louis Rockoff v. Vitex Manufacturing Company, Ltd, 342 F.2d 996, 51 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 31,679 (3d Cir. 1965).

Pincite

342 F.2d 996 (Louis Rockoff v. Vitex Manufacturing Company, Ltd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related