Louis McMillan v. Union Carbide, Stanley Smith Security, Inc. and Mike Terrell, Individuall

Court of Appeals of Texas

Louis McMillan v. Union Carbide, Stanley Smith Security, Inc. and Mike Terrell, Individuall

DecidedApril 19, 2001

Docket13-00-00480-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Louis McMillan v. Union Carbide, Stanley Smith Security, Inc. and Mike Terrell, Individuall (Louis McMillan v. Union Carbide, Stanley Smith Security, Inc. and Mike Terrell, Individuall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Louis McMillan v. Union Carbide, Stanley Smith Security, Inc. and Mike Terrell, Individuall, (Tex. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-00-480-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

LOUIS McMILLAN

, Appellant,

v.

UNION CARBIDE, S

TANLEY SMITH SECURITY,

INC., AND MIKE TERRELL, IND., Appellees.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yanezez

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, LOUIS McMILLAN, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 135th District Court of Goliad County, Texas, in cause number 97-1-7559-CV. After the clerk's record was filed, appellant filed an agreed motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, appellant states he no longer desires to pursue this appeal. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's agreed motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellant's motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 19^th day of April, 2001.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-00-480-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

LOUIS McMILLAN

, Appellant,

v.

UNION CARBIDE, S

TANLEY SMITH SECURITY,

INC., AND MIKE TERRELL, IND., Appellees.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yanezez

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, LOUIS McMILLAN, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 135th District Court of Goliad County, Texas, in cause number 97-1-7559-CV. After the clerk's record was filed, appellant filed an agreed motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, appellant states he no longer desires to pursue this appeal. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's agreed motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellant's motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 19^th day of April, 2001.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Louis McMillan v. Union Carbide, Stanley Smith Security, Inc. and Mike Terrell, Individuall, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louis-mcmillan-v-union-carbide-stanley-smith-secur-texapp-2001.