Louis Matteucci v. Paddy Eugene Messersmith

Ninth Circuit

Louis Matteucci v. Paddy Eugene Messersmith

385 F.2d 1023

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 30, 1967·No. 21399·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion to dismiss for lack of federal jurisdiction, based on alleged diversity of citizenship. It presents a complicated factual situation upon which the trial court concluded there was diversity, and hence jurisdiction.

We approve and confirm the trial court’s finding and order (C.T. 75-79), and on the authorities therein enumerated we affirm. Messersmith v. Matteucci, D.C., 276 F.Supp. 310.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion to dismiss for lack of federal jurisdiction, based on alleged diversity of citizenship. It presents a complicated factual situation upon which the trial court concluded there was diversity, and hence jurisdiction.

We approve and confirm the trial court’s finding and order (C.T. 75-79), and on the authorities therein enumerated we affirm. Messersmith v. Matteucci, D.C., 276 F.Supp. 310.

Louis Matteucci v. Paddy Eugene Messersmith, 385 F.2d 1023 (9th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

385 F.2d 1023 (Louis Matteucci v. Paddy Eugene Messersmith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related