Louis Jackson v. Southfield Neighborhood Revitalization Initiative

Michigan Supreme Court

Louis Jackson v. Southfield Neighborhood Revitalization Initiative

DecidedFebruary 2, 2021

Docket160888

StatusPublished

This text of Louis Jackson v. Southfield Neighborhood Revitalization Initiative (Louis Jackson v. Southfield Neighborhood Revitalization Initiative) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Louis Jackson v. Southfield Neighborhood Revitalization Initiative, (Mich. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

February 2, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

160888 Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh LOUIS JACKSON, MICHAEL C. BIRAC, LEE Elizabeth M. Welch, CRAFT, GAYLYNN CRAFT, RONALD Justices HAYES, EVERTT HODGE, STEFANIE BOYD, LISA SMITH, and MALIK LOWRY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and SMFJ and DONALD SWINNEY, Plaintiffs, v SC: 160888 COA: 344058 Oakland CC: 2018-162877-NZ SOUTHFIELD NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION INITIATIVE, FRED ZORN, ETOILE LIBBETT, MICHAEL A. MANDELBAUM, CITY OF SOUTHFIELD, KEN SIVER, OAKLAND COUNTY TREASURER, SOUTHFIELD NON-PROFIT HOUSING CORPORATION, SUSAN WARD WITKOWSKI, a/k/a SUSAN WARD or SUSAN WITKOWSKI, GERALD WITKOWSKI, and ANDREW MEISNER, Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 19, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for reconsideration of the defendants’ motions for summary disposition in light of Rafaeli v Oakland Co, ___ Mich ___ (Docket No. 156849, decided on July 17, 2020). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. February 2, 2021 b0125 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

February 2, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

160888 Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh LOUIS JACKSON, MICHAEL C. BIRAC, LEE Elizabeth M. Welch, CRAFT, GAYLYNN CRAFT, RONALD Justices HAYES, EVERTT HODGE, STEFANIE BOYD, LISA SMITH, and MALIK LOWRY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and SMFJ and DONALD SWINNEY, Plaintiffs, v SC: 160888 COA: 344058 Oakland CC: 2018-162877-NZ SOUTHFIELD NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION INITIATIVE, FRED ZORN, ETOILE LIBBETT, MICHAEL A. MANDELBAUM, CITY OF SOUTHFIELD, KEN SIVER, OAKLAND COUNTY TREASURER, SOUTHFIELD NON-PROFIT HOUSING CORPORATION, SUSAN WARD WITKOWSKI, a/k/a SUSAN WARD or SUSAN WITKOWSKI, GERALD WITKOWSKI, and ANDREW MEISNER, Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 19, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for reconsideration of the defendants’ motions for summary disposition in light of Rafaeli v Oakland Co, ___ Mich ___ (Docket No. 156849, decided on July 17, 2020). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. February 2, 2021 b0125 Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Louis Jackson v. Southfield Neighborhood Revitalization Initiative, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louis-jackson-v-southfield-neighborhood-revitalization-initiative-mich-2021.