Louis Hopkins v. United Parcel Services, Incorporated

25 F.3d 1039, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20924, 1994 WL 237463
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 3, 1994
Docket91-2753
StatusPublished

This text of 25 F.3d 1039 (Louis Hopkins v. United Parcel Services, Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Louis Hopkins v. United Parcel Services, Incorporated, 25 F.3d 1039, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20924, 1994 WL 237463 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

25 F.3d 1039
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Louis HOPKINS, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendant Appellee.

No. 91-2753.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 1993.
Decided June 3, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. James B. McMillan, Senior District Judge. (CA-88-490)

Louis Hopkins, Appellant Pro Se.

William H. Sturges, Weinstein & Sturges, P.A., Charlotte, NC, for Appellee.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM

Louis Hopkins appeals from the district court's order granting United Parcel Services' motion for summary judgment in this employment discrimination action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hopkins v. United Parcel Serv., Inc, No. CA-88-940 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 31, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 F.3d 1039, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20924, 1994 WL 237463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louis-hopkins-v-united-parcel-services-incorporate-ca4-1994.