Louis Holloway v. State of Mississippi
468 F.2d 920
Opinions
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1 The district court did not err in holding (1) that the arrest in question was supported by the requisite probable cause, and (2) that appellant’s conviction was not tainted by constitutionally impermissible identification procedures.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Louis Holloway v. State of Mississippi, 468 F.2d 920 (5th Cir. 1972).
468 F.2d 920 (Louis Holloway v. State of Mississippi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
National Labor Relations Board v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Local 990
430 F.2d 966 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, Defendant-Third Party v. Marine Mart, Inc., Third Party
431 F.2d 409 (Third Circuit, 1970)