Louis Hinojos v. State Farm Lloyds and Raul Pulido

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Louis Hinojos v. State Farm Lloyds and Raul Pulido. Read the opinion of the Court — 569 S.W.3d 304
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 18, 2019·No. 08-16-00121-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

LOUIS HINOJOS, § No. 08-16-00121-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v. § County Court at Law No. 6 STATE FARM LLOYDS and RAUL § PULIDO, of El Paso County, Texas § Appellees. (TC# 2014-DCV0368) §

JUDGMENT

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee

recover from Appellant and his sureties, if any, see TEX.R.APP.P. 43.5, on the judgment and all

costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 18TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2019.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Louis Hinojos v. State Farm Lloyds and Raul Pulido, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Louis Hinojos v. State Farm Lloyds and Raul Pulido (Louis Hinojos v. State Farm Lloyds and Raul Pulido) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.