Louis Hilton v. Parker Evatt, Commissioner Attorney General of the State of South Carolina

45 F.3d 426, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40378, 1994 WL 717495
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 29, 1994
Docket93-7166
StatusPublished

This text of 45 F.3d 426 (Louis Hilton v. Parker Evatt, Commissioner Attorney General of the State of South Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Louis Hilton v. Parker Evatt, Commissioner Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, 45 F.3d 426, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40378, 1994 WL 717495 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

45 F.3d 426
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Louis HILTON, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
Parker EVATT, Commissioner; Attorney General of the State
of South Carolina, Respondents Appellees.

No. 93-7166.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 30, 1994.
Decided: Dec. 29, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. C. Weston Houck, Chief District Judge. (CA-90-1762-3-2B)

Vance L. Cowden, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA LAW SCHOOL, Columbia, SC, for Appellant. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, SC, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion rejecting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hilton v. Evatt, No. CA-90-1762-3-2B (D.S.C. Oct. 1, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 F.3d 426, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40378, 1994 WL 717495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louis-hilton-v-parker-evatt-commissioner-attorney--ca4-1994.