Louis Hancock Daitch v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 10, 2013·No. 05-12-01485-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered July 10, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01485-CR

LOUIS HANCOCK DAITCH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F04-44009-J

ORDER Appellant has informed the Court that he wishes to file a pro se response to the Anders

brief filed by appellate counsel. Although counsel’s motion to withdraw reflects that appellant

was provided a copy of the record, appellant’s request seeks to obtain copies of the record in

order to prepare his pro se response. The address for appellant contained in counsel’s motion to

withdraw is for a different facility than the one on appellant’s request for the record, and the

Court cannot determine whether appellant actually received the record counsel indicated was

sent to him.

Accordingly, we ORDER appellate counsel Riann Moore to provide appellant with

copies of the clerk’s and reporter’s records. We further ORDER Ms. Moore to provide this Court, within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order, with written verification that the record

has been sent to appellant.

Appellant’s pro se response is due by SEPTEMBER 20, 2013.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by electronic transmission, to Riann

Moore, Dallas County Public Defender’s Office.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by first-class mail, to Louis Daitch,

TDCJ No. 1819611, Byrd Unit, 21 F.M. 247, Huntsville, Texas 77320.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Louis Hancock Daitch v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Louis Hancock Daitch v. State (Louis Hancock Daitch v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.