Louis Goldey Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Louis Goldey Co. v. United States

43 Cust. Ct. 434

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedDecember 15, 1959

DocketNo. 63611; protest 328581-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 43 Cust. Ct. 434 (Louis Goldey Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Louis Goldey Co. v. United States, 43 Cust. Ct. 434 (cusc 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that the merchandise consists of glazed tiles, measuring 414 by 4% inches, although shown on the consular invoice as being 4% by 4% inches in size; that duty was assessed upon an amount in excess of that actually imported; and that the following quantities were imported: Invoice No. 1, cases 1 to 1,000, on a quantity of 15,000 square feet, and invoice No. 4, cases 1 to 2,000, on a quantity of 30,000 square feet. Accordingly, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to said merchandise.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that the merchandise consists of glazed tiles, measuring 414 by 4% inches, although shown on the consular invoice as being 4% by 4% inches in size; that duty was assessed upon an amount in excess of that actually imported; and that the following quantities were imported: Invoice No. 1, cases 1 to 1,000, on a quantity of 15,000 square feet, and invoice No. 4, cases 1 to 2,000, on a quantity of 30,000 square feet. Accordingly, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to said merchandise.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 Cust. Ct. 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louis-goldey-co-v-united-states-cusc-1959.