Louis G. Beary v. City of Rohnert Park Jimmie Rogers
This text of 62 F.3d 1423 (Louis G. Beary v. City of Rohnert Park Jimmie Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
62 F.3d 1423
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Louis G. BEARY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF ROHNERT PARK; Jimmie Rogers, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-16706.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 2, 1995.*
Decided Aug. 8, 1995.
Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Louis Beary appeals pro se the order granting summary judgment on his civil rights causes of action as barred by the statute of limitations. Beary contends that the district court erred by concluding that he could have discovered the injury and its cause before February 1, 1993 through the exercise of reasonable diligence. Having conducted a de novo review, Timmel v. Moss, 803 F.2d 519, 520 (9th Cir. 1986), we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order, which fully and fairly addressed the issue.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 F.3d 1423, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 29304, 1995 WL 468331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louis-g-beary-v-city-of-rohnert-park-jimmie-rogers-ca9-1995.