Louis A. Wingard III v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 1, 2016
Docket15-5513
StatusPublished

This text of Louis A. Wingard III v. State of Florida (Louis A. Wingard III v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Louis A. Wingard III v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

LOUIS A. WINGARD III, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D15-5513

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed June 1, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition -- Original Jurisdiction.

Louis A. Wingard, III, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Donna A. Gerace, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied.

ROWE, KELSEY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Louis A. Wingard III v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louis-a-wingard-iii-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2016.