Louis A. Lapides v. Armorflex Chemical Corporation, Albert D. Greenfield, Movants-Appellants

Fifth Circuit

Louis A. Lapides v. Armorflex Chemical Corporation, Albert D. Greenfield, Movants-Appellants

476 F.2d 1289, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9890

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 17, 1973

Docket72-2032

StatusPublished

This text of 476 F.2d 1289 (Louis A. Lapides v. Armorflex Chemical Corporation, Albert D. Greenfield, Movants-Appellants) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Louis A. Lapides v. Armorflex Chemical Corporation, Albert D. Greenfield, Movants-Appellants, 476 F.2d 1289, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9890 (5th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment denying .the motion to quash the levy in this matter is affirmed. The stock which is the subject matter of the levy in question was being held in trust to secure indebtedness due appellants, appellee, and others by the judgment debtor. Appellee Lapides obtained the judgment which gave rise to the levy by suit on the portion of the debt due him. Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellants’ and other beneficiaries under the trust seeking relief in the district court as to the subject matter of the levy on the basis of their respective interests, if any, in the debt pro tanto to the interest of Lapides as his interest is reflected in the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment denying .the motion to quash the levy in this matter is affirmed. The stock which is the subject matter of the levy in question was being held in trust to secure indebtedness due appellants, appellee, and others by the judgment debtor. Appellee Lapides obtained the judgment which gave rise to the levy by suit on the portion of the debt due him. Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellants’ and other beneficiaries under the trust seeking relief in the district court as to the subject matter of the levy on the basis of their respective interests, if any, in the debt pro tanto to the interest of Lapides as his interest is reflected in the judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

476 F.2d 1289, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louis-a-lapides-v-armorflex-chemical-corporation-albert-d-greenfield-ca5-1973.