Louie v. State
Opinion
Danny LOUIE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Laura Grether Martin, Appellate Defender Office, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun Mackelprang and Roger W. Johnson, Office Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before PAUL M. SPINDEN, Presiding Judge, JAMES M. SMART, JR., Judge, and JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge.
ORDER
Danny Louie appeals the circuit court's judgment to deny his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. In his motion, Louie asserted two claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The circuit court denied the first claim without an evidentiary hearing and denied the second claim after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm in this per curiam order entered pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
249 S.W.3d 897 (Louie v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.