Louie Schexnayder, Jr. v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden

643 F. App'x 417
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 13, 2016·No. 13-30981·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The judgment of the district court is vacated and Petitioner’s Rule 60(b) motion is remanded to that court. Because the federal court has not considered constitutional claims related to the decisions of the Louisiana courts after the Louisiana Supreme Court’s judgment in State v. Cordero, 993 So.2d 203 (La.2008), the present motion is not successive, but is a true Rule 60(b) motion entitled to be decided.

*418 Judgment VACATED and Motion REMANDED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Louie Schexnayder, Jr. v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden, 643 F. App'x 417 (5th Cir. 2016).

643 F. App'x 417 (Louie Schexnayder, Jr. v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chris Gilkers v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
904 F.3d 336 (Fifth Circuit, 2018)