Louie Schexnayder, Jr. v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden

643 F. App'x 417
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 13, 2016
Docket13-30981
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 643 F. App'x 417 (Louie Schexnayder, Jr. v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Louie Schexnayder, Jr. v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden, 643 F. App'x 417 (5th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The judgment of the district court is vacated and Petitioner’s Rule 60(b) motion is remanded to that court. Because the federal court has not considered constitutional claims related to the decisions of the Louisiana courts after the Louisiana Supreme Court’s judgment in State v. Cordero, 993 So.2d 203 (La.2008), the present motion is not successive, but is a true Rule 60(b) motion entitled to be decided.

*418 Judgment VACATED and Motion REMANDED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chris Gilkers v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
904 F.3d 336 (Fifth Circuit, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
643 F. App'x 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louie-schexnayder-jr-v-darrel-vannoy-warden-ca5-2016.