Louie Papakostas v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 27, 2002
Docket13-02-00427-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Louie Papakostas v. State (Louie Papakostas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Louie Papakostas v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

                                   NUMBER 13-02-427-CR

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

LOUIE PAPAKOSTAS,         Appellant,

                                                   v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                          Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

                         On appeal from the 28th District Court

                                  of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

                                   O P I N I O N

                   Before Justices Dorsey, Rodriguez, and Castillo

                                       Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, LOUIE PAPAKOSTAS, attempted to perfect an appeal from the trial court=s denial of bond, in cause no. 86-CR-1564-A.  The clerk=s record was received on August 12, 2002. 


Upon review of the clerk=s record, it appeared that the order from which  this appeal was taken was not contained in the clerk=s record.  Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done.  Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  To date, appellant has failed to correct the defect.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s failure to correct the defect, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 27th day of November, 2002.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Louie Papakostas v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louie-papakostas-v-state-texapp-2002.