Louie Monroe Allen v. United States

271 F.2d 226
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 27, 1959
Docket17758
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 271 F.2d 226 (Louie Monroe Allen v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Louie Monroe Allen v. United States, 271 F.2d 226 (5th Cir. 1959).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant attacks his conviction for carrying on the business of a wholesale liquor dealer without paying the special tax. 26 U.S.C.A. § 5691. The evidence showing a series of weekly and biweekly sales totaling 408.3 cases of liquor by defendant to a private club over the period from May 1957 to November 1958, amounting to $32,227.01, adequately supports a finding implicit in the verdict of guilty that appellant held himself out as a wholesale liquor dealer ready, willing and able to deliver liquor in quantities of five wine gallons in one sale. 26 U.S.C.A. § 5112. Johnson v. United States, 5 Cir., 1936, 84 F.2d 114; Taran v. United States, 8 Cir., 1937, 88 F.2d 54. Finally, appellant did not object below to the portion of the jury charge now complained of. He thus waived his right to complain. F.R.Crim. P. 30, 18 U.S.C.A. Moreover, the instruction is not shown to have been improper or prejudicially harmful.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rico J. Alvarez v. United States
275 F.2d 299 (Fifth Circuit, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 F.2d 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louie-monroe-allen-v-united-states-ca5-1959.