Louhal Properties, Inc. v. Strada

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Louhal Properties, Inc. v. Strada

307 A.D.2d 1029, 763 N.Y.S.2d 773

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 25, 2003·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action for a judgment, inter alia, declaring that Local Law No. 10 (2000) and Local Law No. 4 (2001) of the Village of Westbury are invalid, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winslow, J.), dated March 28, 2002, which, among other things, granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for the entry of a judgment declaring that Local Law No. 10 (2000) and Local Law No. 4 (2001) of the Village of Westbury are invalid.

We agree, for reasons stated by the Supreme Court (191 Misc 2d 746 [2002]), that Local Law No. 10 (2000) and Local Law No. 4 (2001) of the Village of Westbury are invalid (see also Matter of Westbury Trombo v Board of Trustees of Vil. of Westbury, 307 AD2d 1043 [2003] [decided herewith]). Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Altman and Cozier, JJ., concur. [See 191 Misc 2d 746.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a judgment, inter alia, declaring that Local Law No. 10 (2000) and Local Law No. 4 (2001) of the Village of Westbury are invalid, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winslow, J.), dated March 28, 2002, which, among other things, granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for the entry of a judgment declaring that Local Law No. 10 (2000) and Local Law No. 4 (2001) of the Village of Westbury are invalid.

We agree, for reasons stated by the Supreme Court (191 Misc 2d 746 [2002]), that Local Law No. 10 (2000) and Local Law No. 4 (2001) of the Village of Westbury are invalid (see also Matter of Westbury Trombo v Board of Trustees of Vil. of Westbury, 307 AD2d 1043 [2003] [decided herewith]). Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Altman and Cozier, JJ., concur. [See 191 Misc 2d 746.]

Louhal Properties, Inc. v. Strada, 307 A.D.2d 1029, 763 N.Y.S.2d 773 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

307 A.D.2d 1029 (Louhal Properties, Inc. v. Strada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related