Loughlin v. G. Heileman Brewing Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Loughlin v. G. Heileman Brewing Co.

189 Ill. App. 176, 1914 Ill. App. LEXIS 294

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided October 13, 1914·No. Gen. No. 19,544·Published

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Brown

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Judgment, § 112*—when order of default not default judgment. An order of court held to be a mere order of default inartificially expressed and not a default judgment. 2, Principal and agent, § 8*—when evidence sufficient to establish agency to contract. In an action against a brewing company to recover for plumbing work done in a saloon which was operated by a third party, whom the plaintiff claimed was authorized by defendant to contract for the work, held that a judgment in favor of plaintiff was sustained by the evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Brown

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Judgment, § 112*—when order of default not default judgment. An order of court held to be a mere order of default inartificially expressed and not a default judgment. 2, Principal and agent, § 8*—when evidence sufficient to establish agency to contract. In an action against a brewing company to recover for plumbing work done in a saloon which was operated by a third party, whom the plaintiff claimed was authorized by defendant to contract for the work, held that a judgment in favor of plaintiff was sustained by the evidence.

Loughlin v. G. Heileman Brewing Co., 189 Ill. App. 176, 1914 Ill. App. LEXIS 294 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

189 Ill. App. 176 (Loughlin v. G. Heileman Brewing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.