Loughlin v. G. Heileman Brewing Co.

189 Ill. App. 176, 1914 Ill. App. LEXIS 294
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedOctober 13, 1914
DocketGen. No. 19,544
StatusPublished

This text of 189 Ill. App. 176 (Loughlin v. G. Heileman Brewing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Loughlin v. G. Heileman Brewing Co., 189 Ill. App. 176, 1914 Ill. App. LEXIS 294 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Brown

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Judgment, § 112*—when order of default not default judgment. An order of court held to be a mere order of default inartificially expressed and not a default judgment. 2, Principal and agent, § 8*—when evidence sufficient to establish agency to contract. In an action against a brewing company to recover for plumbing work done in a saloon which was operated by a third party, whom the plaintiff claimed was authorized by defendant to contract for the work, held that a judgment in favor of plaintiff was sustained by the evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
189 Ill. App. 176, 1914 Ill. App. LEXIS 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loughlin-v-g-heileman-brewing-co-illappct-1914.