Loughlin v. City of New York

270 A.D. 941, 62 N.Y.S.2d 35, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4792

Opinion

Action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered as a consequence of a fall on a wet subway platform. Plaintiff recovered a judgment and defendant appeals. Judgment reversed on the law, with costs, and the complaint dismissed on the law, with costs. The findings of fact implicit in the verdict are affirmed. No negligence on the part of the defendant was established. (Brand V. Inter-borough B. T. Go., 249 App. Div. 630, affd. 273 N. Y. 658; Abair v. City of New York, 295 N. Y. 789; Boettcher v. Dowling, 270 N. Y. 557.) The case.of Bordes v. Murray (284 N. Y. 761) is not to the contrary and may be distinguished on its facts. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Aldrich and Nolan, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 1025.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Loughlin v. City of New York, 270 A.D. 941, 62 N.Y.S.2d 35, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4792 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

270 A.D. 941 (Loughlin v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brand v. Interborough Rapid Transit Company
8 N.E.2d 334 (New York Court of Appeals, 1937)
Bordes v. Murray
31 N.E.2d 513 (New York Court of Appeals, 1940)
Abair v. City of New York
66 N.E.2d 300 (New York Court of Appeals, 1946)
Boettcher v. Dowling
200 N.E. 316 (New York Court of Appeals, 1936)