Lough v. White

North Dakota Supreme Court

Lough v. White

100 N.W. 1084, 13 N.D. 387, 1904 N.D. LEXIS 54

CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 7, 1904

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 100 N.W. 1084 (Lough v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lough v. White, 100 N.W. 1084, 13 N.D. 387, 1904 N.D. LEXIS 54 (N.D. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant has attempted to appeal from an order of the district court dismissing his appeal from a justice’s court judgment. Under our statute, as repeatedly held by this court, such orders are not appealable. See In re Weber, 4 N. D. 119, 59 N. W. 523, 28 L. R. A. 621; Field v. Elevator Co., 5 N. D. 400, 67 N. W. 147; Prondzinski v. Garbutt, 9 N. D. 239, 83 N. W. 23.

The appeal must therefore be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant has attempted to appeal from an order of the district court dismissing his appeal from a justice’s court judgment. Under our statute, as repeatedly held by this court, such orders are not appealable. See In re Weber, 4 N. D. 119, 59 N. W. 523, 28 L. R. A. 621; Field v. Elevator Co., 5 N. D. 400, 67 N. W. 147; Prondzinski v. Garbutt, 9 N. D. 239, 83 N. W. 23.

The appeal must therefore be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 N.W. 1084, 13 N.D. 387, 1904 N.D. LEXIS 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lough-v-white-nd-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack