Louey v. Auger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Louey v. Auger

202 A.D.2d 940, 610 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3051

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 202 A.D.2d 940 (Louey v. Auger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Louey v. Auger, 202 A.D.2d 940, 610 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3051 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from an order of thé Supreme Court (Ryan, Jr., J.), entered June 4, 1993 in Franklin County, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Plaintiff Noreen A. Louey commenced this action for damages suffered when she was hit by a vehicle operated by defendant as she attempted to cross a street. She subsequently moved for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability. Supreme Court properly found that questions of fact exist as to liability, including whether Louey suffered a "serious injury” as defined in the Insurance Law.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from an order of thé Supreme Court (Ryan, Jr., J.), entered June 4, 1993 in Franklin County, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Plaintiff Noreen A. Louey commenced this action for damages suffered when she was hit by a vehicle operated by defendant as she attempted to cross a street. She subsequently moved for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability. Supreme Court properly found that questions of fact exist as to liability, including whether Louey suffered a "serious injury” as defined in the Insurance Law.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 A.D.2d 940, 610 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louey-v-auger-nyappdiv-1994.