Loudon v. United States

28 Cust. Ct. 557, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 634
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedFebruary 19, 1952
DocketNo. 8091; Entry No. 4685, etc.
StatusPublished

This text of 28 Cust. Ct. 557 (Loudon v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Loudon v. United States, 28 Cust. Ct. 557, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 634 (cusc 1952).

Opinion

OliveR, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

It is hereby stipulated as follows between counsel for plaintiffs and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, concerning the merchandise referred to herein:
1) That the market value or the price, at the time of exportation to the United States of the merchandise covered by these appeals to reappraisement, enumerated on attached schedule, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States, was the [558]*558appraised value less the amount added to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases and that there is no higher foreign value.
2) That these appeals to reappraisement be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the appraised values, less the amounts added to-meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 Cust. Ct. 557, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loudon-v-united-states-cusc-1952.