Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Loudermilk v. Bailey

Loudermilk v. Bailey

126 S.E. 373, 159 Ga. 514, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 5
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 14, 1925
DocketNo. 4349
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 126 S.E. 373 (Loudermilk v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Loudermilk v. Bailey, 126 S.E. 373, 159 Ga. 514, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 5 (Ga. 1925).

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

Tlie omission of a prayer for process is amendable. Lyons v. Planters’ Bank, 86 Ga. 485 (12 S. E. 882, 12 L. R. A. 155); BarnesFain Co. v. Chandler, 148 Ga. 158 (96 S. E. 179), and citations. Consequently the court erred in refusing to allow the amendment offered, adding a prayer for process, and in thereafter dismissing the action because there had been no legal process.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. Thomas A. Brown and B. L. Smith, for plaintiff. J. G. Collins, Pat Haralson, and T. 8. Candler, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Purcell v. Hill
129 S.E.2d 341 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Bell v. Ayers
60 S.E.2d 523 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
Crown Laundry v. Burch
53 S.E.2d 116 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)
Burch v. Crown Laundry
50 S.E.2d 768 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 S.E. 373, 159 Ga. 514, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loudermilk-v-bailey-ga-1925.