Loudenslager v. Pacific Improvement Co.

115 A. 752, 93 N.J. Eq. 218, 8 Stock. 218, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 280
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 14, 1921
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 115 A. 752 (Loudenslager v. Pacific Improvement Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Loudenslager v. Pacific Improvement Co., 115 A. 752, 93 N.J. Eq. 218, 8 Stock. 218, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 280 (N.J. 1921).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenoi-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Heppeñheimer, Williams, Gardner, Van Buskirk — 13. Bor reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wagenheim v. Willcox
251 A.2d 781 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)
Margate Park Protective Ass'n. v. Abate
92 A.2d 110 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
ARCHAMBAULT v. Sprouse
63 S.E.2d 459 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1951)
The Riverton Country Club v. Thomas
58 A.2d 89 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)
Logatto v. Banta
188 A. 740 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1937)
Marneil Realty Corp. v. Twin Brook Realty Corp.
179 A. 110 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 A. 752, 93 N.J. Eq. 218, 8 Stock. 218, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loudenslager-v-pacific-improvement-co-nj-1921.