Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Loudenslager v. Pacific Improvement Co.

Loudenslager v. Pacific Improvement Co.

115 A. 752, 93 N.J. Eq. 218, 8 Stock. 218, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 280
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 14, 1921·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenoi-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Heppeñheimer, Williams, Gardner, Van Buskirk — 13. Bor reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Loudenslager v. Pacific Improvement Co., 115 A. 752, 93 N.J. Eq. 218, 8 Stock. 218, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 280 (N.J. 1921).

115 A. 752 (Loudenslager v. Pacific Improvement Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wagenheim v. Willcox
251 A.2d 781 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)
Margate Park Protective Ass'n. v. Abate
92 A.2d 110 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
ARCHAMBAULT v. Sprouse
63 S.E.2d 459 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1951)
The Riverton Country Club v. Thomas
58 A.2d 89 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)
Logatto v. Banta
188 A. 740 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1937)
Marneil Realty Corp. v. Twin Brook Realty Corp.
179 A. 110 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1935)