Loucks v. Board of Education
258 A.D. 1003, 16 N.Y.S.2d 733, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8616
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 10, 1940·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
This is a proceeding to review a determination of the board of education of the city of Amsterdam wherein the petitioner, Nettie B. Loucks, was dismissed as a teacher from the public schools of the city of Amsterdam. It is based upon an examination by the medical inspector who reported as follows:
“ May 17, 1939.
“ To Supt. of Schools Amsterdam, N. Y.
“ Because of physical disability revealed by a recent physical Examination of Mrs. Nettie B. Loucks I do not feel that she is competent to perform her duties as a teacher in the Public Schools of this city.
“ Respectfully yours,
“ E. H. ORMSBY MD
“ Medical Inspector.”
There was evidence in the record supporting the charge and the determination of the board of education is confirmed, without costs. Determination confirmed, without costs. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Schenck and Foster, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Loucks v. Board of Education, 258 A.D. 1003, 16 N.Y.S.2d 733, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8616 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).
258 A.D. 1003 (Loucks v. Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
California School Employees Association v. Jefferson Elementary School District
45 Cal. App. 3d 683 (California Court of Appeal, 1975)
Coriou v. Nyquist
33 A.D.2d 580 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)
Brown v. Board of Education
44 Misc. 2d 466 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)
Hostetter v. Alderson
241 P.2d 230 (California Supreme Court, 1952)