Louchheim v. Davies
24 A. 72, 148 Pa. 499, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1010
Opinion
We are of opinion that the facts of this case justified the instructions of the court. It was for the jury to say, under all [502] the evidence, whether Clarence Davies had authority to bind the defendant to accept the coats in question. As there is nothing else in the case, it does not require discussion.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Louchheim v. Davies, 24 A. 72, 148 Pa. 499, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1010 (Pa. 1892).
24 A. 72 (Louchheim v. Davies) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ellinger v. Rawlings
40 N.E. 146 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1895)