Loubet v. Loubet
230 A.2d 552, 155 Conn. 695
Opinion
The opposing affidavit of the defendant contained no recital of facts which would be admissible in evidence, nor was any documentary proof submitted to show that there was a genuine issue as to any material fact alleged in the complaint. Practice Book §§ 300, 303; Kasowitz v. Mutual Construction Co., 154 Conn. 607, 613, 228 A.2d 149; Rathkopf v. Pearson, 148 Conn. 260, 263, 170 A.2d 135.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Loubet v. Loubet, 230 A.2d 552, 155 Conn. 695 (Colo. 1967).
230 A.2d 552 (Loubet v. Loubet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Citizens National Bank v. Hubney
438 A.2d 430 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1980)
Ellum v. Prudential Insurance
274 A.2d 454 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1970)
Manchester Memorial Hospital v. Whitney
269 A.2d 300 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1969)
United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment Commission
260 A.2d 596 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1969)
Dorazio v. M. B. Foster Electric Co.
253 A.2d 22 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1968)