Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Loubet v. Loubet

Loubet v. Loubet

230 A.2d 552, 155 Conn. 695
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJune 8, 1967
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 230 A.2d 552 (Loubet v. Loubet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Loubet v. Loubet, 230 A.2d 552, 155 Conn. 695 (Colo. 1967).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The opposing affidavit of the defendant contained no recital of facts which would be admissible in evidence, nor was any documentary proof submitted to show that there was a genuine issue as to any material fact alleged in the complaint. Practice Book §§ 300, 303; Kasowitz v. Mutual Construction Co., 154 Conn. 607, 613, 228 A.2d 149; Rathkopf v. Pearson, 148 Conn. 260, 263, 170 A.2d 135.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Citizens National Bank v. Hubney
438 A.2d 430 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1980)
Ellum v. Prudential Insurance
274 A.2d 454 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1970)
Manchester Memorial Hospital v. Whitney
269 A.2d 300 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1969)
United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment Commission
260 A.2d 596 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1969)
Dorazio v. M. B. Foster Electric Co.
253 A.2d 22 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 A.2d 552, 155 Conn. 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loubet-v-loubet-conn-1967.