Loubat v. Le Roy
Opinion
delivering the main opinion, and Davis, P. J., concurring in a brief opinion in which he placed his concurrence in the conclusion reached “altogether upon the ground that the appellant was attempted to be removed without trial and opportunity to be heard secured to him by the constitution and by-laws of the club and Brady, J., concurring in the result.
The general principles of law enunciated by the learned justice at the special term, and considered by him at length, are not questioned by the appellate court, the difference in result arising mainly upon the question as to whether notice and opportunity to be heard before the sub-committee was sufficient, without a hearing before the governing committee with whom the decision rested.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
17 Abb. N. Cas. 512 (Loubat v. Le Roy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.