Lou Ann Hughes and Performance Products, Inc.// James Pearcy v. James Pearcy// Lou Ann Hughes and Performance Products, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 9, 2014·No. 03-10-00319-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 8, 2014

NO. 03-10-00319-CV

Appellants, Lou Ann Hughes and Performance Products, Inc.// Cross-Appellant, James Pearcy

v.

Appellee, James Pearcy// Cross-Appellees, Lou Ann Hughes and Performance Products, Inc.

APPEAL FROM THE 433RD DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES HENSON AND GOODWIN AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN; JUSTICE HENSON NOT PARTICIPATING

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on March 9, 2010. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The

appellants shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lou Ann Hughes and Performance Products, Inc.// James Pearcy v. James Pearcy// Lou Ann Hughes and Performance Products, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Lou Ann Hughes and Performance Products, Inc.// James Pearcy v. James Pearcy// Lou Ann Hughes and Performance Products, Inc. (Lou Ann Hughes and Performance Products, Inc.// James Pearcy v. James Pearcy// Lou Ann Hughes and Performance Products, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.