Lou Ann Hughes and Performance Products, Inc.// James Pearcy v. James Pearcy// Lou Ann Hughes and Performance Products, Inc.
This text of Lou Ann Hughes and Performance Products, Inc.// James Pearcy v. James Pearcy// Lou Ann Hughes and Performance Products, Inc. (Lou Ann Hughes and Performance Products, Inc.// James Pearcy v. James Pearcy// Lou Ann Hughes and Performance Products, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 8, 2014
NO. 03-10-00319-CV
Appellants, Lou Ann Hughes and Performance Products, Inc.// Cross-Appellant, James Pearcy
v.
Appellee, James Pearcy// Cross-Appellees, Lou Ann Hughes and Performance Products, Inc.
APPEAL FROM THE 433RD DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES HENSON AND GOODWIN AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN; JUSTICE HENSON NOT PARTICIPATING
This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on March 9, 2010. Having
reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error
in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The
appellants shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lou Ann Hughes and Performance Products, Inc.// James Pearcy v. James Pearcy// Lou Ann Hughes and Performance Products, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lou-ann-hughes-and-performance-products-inc-james--texapp-2014.