Lotz v. Levy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lotz v. Levy

120 A.D. 477, 104 N.Y.S. 1058, 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1221

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 7, 1907·Published

Opinion

Gaynor, J.

,The letters between the parties do not show,that the defendant employed the plaintiffs, or that they produced a purchaser. ' They^ could not require the defendant to come to New York to meet proposed purchasers'; it was for them to produce, a purchaser tb him.

■ The judgment should be reversed.

Woodward, Jenks, Hooker and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Judgment reversed, and new .trial granted,Acosts to abide the.' event. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gaynor, J.

,The letters between the parties do not show,that the defendant employed the plaintiffs, or that they produced a purchaser. ' They^ could not require the defendant to come to New York to meet proposed purchasers'; it was for them to produce, a purchaser tb him.

■ The judgment should be reversed.

Woodward, Jenks, Hooker and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Judgment reversed, and new .trial granted,Acosts to abide the.' event. .

Lotz v. Levy, 120 A.D. 477, 104 N.Y.S. 1058, 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1221 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

120 A.D. 477 (Lotz v. Levy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.