Lotus Exim International, Inc. v. Pacific Employers Insurance

244 A.D.2d 189, 665 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11363
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 13, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 244 A.D.2d 189 (Lotus Exim International, Inc. v. Pacific Employers Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lotus Exim International, Inc. v. Pacific Employers Insurance, 244 A.D.2d 189, 665 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11363 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Oman-sky, J.), entered September 4, 1996, which, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $50,000, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We decline to disturb the trial court’s factual findings that this claim arose from an off-premises robbery of plaintiffs employee and that any misrepresentation as to plaintiff insured’s office premises was not material with respect to the subject policy. There is no evidence in the record that defendant would not have issued the policy had they known of the alleged misrepresentation. We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Nardelli, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DiDonna v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
259 A.D.2d 727 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 A.D.2d 189, 665 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lotus-exim-international-inc-v-pacific-employers-insurance-nyappdiv-1997.