Lottie B. Phillips v. United States of America, Wiley Phillips, Third Party Claimant-Appellant

Third Circuit

Lottie B. Phillips v. United States of America, Wiley Phillips, Third Party Claimant-Appellant

440 F.2d 993, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10347

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMay 6, 1971

Docket30802_1

StatusPublished

This text of 440 F.2d 993 (Lottie B. Phillips v. United States of America, Wiley Phillips, Third Party Claimant-Appellant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lottie B. Phillips v. United States of America, Wiley Phillips, Third Party Claimant-Appellant, 440 F.2d 993, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10347 (3d Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This veteran’s insurance claim having been presented to the trial court by stipulation of the parties on the record presented to the Board of Veterans Appeals, and the trial court having concluded *994 that the entire face amount of the policy of the deceased veteran should be paid to his wife as against the claim of the veteran’s father for one-half of the proceeds as contingent beneficiary, it appears that the ambiguity on the face of the official forms relating to the primary and contingent beneficiaries is such as to permit the trial court to resolve the issue in favor of the wife, as it did.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This veteran’s insurance claim having been presented to the trial court by stipulation of the parties on the record presented to the Board of Veterans Appeals, and the trial court having concluded *994 that the entire face amount of the policy of the deceased veteran should be paid to his wife as against the claim of the veteran’s father for one-half of the proceeds as contingent beneficiary, it appears that the ambiguity on the face of the official forms relating to the primary and contingent beneficiaries is such as to permit the trial court to resolve the issue in favor of the wife, as it did.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

440 F.2d 993, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lottie-b-phillips-v-united-states-of-america-wiley-phillips-third-party-ca3-1971.