Lotterman v. F. H. McGraw & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lotterman v. F. H. McGraw & Co.

30 A.D.2d 654, 292 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3716

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 18, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.2d 654 (Lotterman v. F. H. McGraw & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lotterman v. F. H. McGraw & Co., 30 A.D.2d 654, 292 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3716 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered February 16, 1968 modified on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, so as to grant defendant’s motion for preclusion, unless a sufficient bill is filed within 10 days of the date of service of a copy of the order hereon. The bill as served does not comply with the prior order. Otherwise the order is affirmed. Concur — Stevens, J. P., Steuer and McNally, JJ.; Tilzer and McGivern, JJ. dissent and vote to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered February 16, 1968 modified on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, so as to grant defendant’s motion for preclusion, unless a sufficient bill is filed within 10 days of the date of service of a copy of the order hereon. The bill as served does not comply with the prior order. Otherwise the order is affirmed. Concur — Stevens, J. P., Steuer and McNally, JJ.; Tilzer and McGivern, JJ. dissent and vote to affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 654, 292 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lotterman-v-f-h-mcgraw-co-nyappdiv-1968.