Lott v. State

127 S.W. 191, 58 Tex. Crim. 604, 1910 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 192
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 6, 1910·No. No. 270.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $25 and twenty days imprisonment in the county jail.

We find no statement of facts in the record. In the absence of same the bills of exceptions do not present any matter authorizing a reversal of the case. The charge of the court is correct, and finding no error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ON REHEARING.
January 12, 1910.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lott v. State, 127 S.W. 191, 58 Tex. Crim. 604, 1910 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 192 (Tex. 1910).

127 S.W. 191 (Lott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McAllister v. State
183 S.W. 145 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)
McAlister v. State
183 S.W. 145 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)
Norwood v. State
158 S.W. 270 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)