Lott v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Lott v. State

1926 OK CR 76, 243 P. 1118, 33 Okla. Crim. 315, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 73

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 6, 1926

DocketNo. A-5313.

StatusPublished

This text of 1926 OK CR 76 (Lott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lott v. State, 1926 OK CR 76, 243 P. 1118, 33 Okla. Crim. 315, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 73 (Okla. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

J. S. Lott, IJ. B. Kilgore, and T. C. Kilgore were jointly charged with the illegal manufacturing of whisky. At the trial T. C. Kilgore was acquitted. By verdict of the jury, J. B. Kilgore and J. S. Lott were found guilty, with the punishment of *316 each assessed at confinement in jail for 30 days and a fine of $50. The judgment of the trial court is reversed, for insufficiency of the evidence, and because the court improperly admitted evidence tending to show that the defendant may have been implicated in another and different offense.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

J. S. Lott, IJ. B. Kilgore, and T. C. Kilgore were jointly charged with the illegal manufacturing of whisky. At the trial T. C. Kilgore was acquitted. By verdict of the jury, J. B. Kilgore and J. S. Lott were found guilty, with the punishment of *316 each assessed at confinement in jail for 30 days and a fine of $50. The judgment of the trial court is reversed, for insufficiency of the evidence, and because the court improperly admitted evidence tending to show that the defendant may have been implicated in another and different offense.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1926 OK CR 76, 243 P. 1118, 33 Okla. Crim. 315, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lott-v-state-oklacrimapp-1926.