Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Lott v. State

Lott v. State

41 So. 3d 428, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11432, 2010 WL 3056621
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 6, 2010
Docket5D09-4229
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 41 So. 3d 428 (Lott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lott v. State, 41 So. 3d 428, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11432, 2010 WL 3056621 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Ramon Lott appeals a restitution order entered following his plea of guilty to a charge of grand theft of a motor vehicle. The only issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in conducting the restitution hearing in Lott’s absence, and without notice to him, when there was no evidence that he waived his appearance at the proceeding. The State concedes error. Accordingly, we reverse the restitution order and remand for a new restitution hearing, with proper notice to Lott.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ORFINGER, LAWSON and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Douglas v. State
41 So. 3d 428 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 So. 3d 428, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11432, 2010 WL 3056621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lott-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.